Stainless Steel AISI 304 vs AISI 316 in EHEDG Certification

AISI 304 vs. AISI 316: Choosing the Right Stainless Steel

In industries where hygiene is paramount, such as food processing, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare, equipment design must adhere to stringent sanitary standards. A critical component in this design is the machine leveling foot, which ensures stability and proper alignment of machinery. The European Hygienic Engineering & Design Group (EHEDG) provides guidelines to ensure that such components meet hygienic requirements. A key consideration in manufacturing these leveling feet is the choice between stainless steel grades AISI 304 and AISI 316.

Understanding AISI 304 and AISI 316 Stainless Steels

Both AISI 304 and AISI 316 are austenitic stainless steels known for their excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. The primary distinction between the two lies in their chemical composition:

• AISI 304: Comprises approximately 18% chromium and 8% nickel.
• AISI 316: Contains similar amounts of chromium and nickel as 304 but includes an additional 2-3% molybdenum.

The inclusion of molybdenum in AISI 316 enhances its resistance to chlorides and other corrosive agents, making it more suitable for harsh environments.

Applications and Industries

The choice between AISI 304 and AISI 316 depends largely on the specific environmental conditions and hygiene requirements of the application:

• Food Processing: Equipment in this sector must withstand frequent cleaning with aggressive agents. AISI 316 is often preferred due to its superior resistance to corrosion, especially in environments exposed to saline solutions or acidic substances.
• Pharmaceuticals: The industry demands the highest hygiene standards to prevent contamination. AISI 316’s enhanced corrosion resistance makes it suitable for equipment exposed to various chemicals and cleaning processes.
• Healthcare: Medical environments require materials that can endure rigorous sterilization. AISI 316 is commonly used due to its durability and resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion.
• General Manufacturing: In less demanding environments, AISI 304 is often sufficient, offering a cost-effective solution with adequate corrosion resistance.

Material Considerations for EHEDG Hygienic Machine Leveling Feet

When designing EHEDG-compliant leveling feet, several factors must be considered:

1. Corrosion Resistance: Given the frequent exposure to cleaning agents and potential contaminants, AISI 316 is generally favored for its superior resistance to corrosion.
2. Surface Finish: A smooth, polished surface minimizes areas where bacteria can harbor, facilitating easier cleaning. Both AISI 304 and AISI 316 can achieve the necessary surface finishes, but AISI 316 may maintain its finish better in aggressive environments.
3. Mechanical Properties: Both grades offer excellent strength and durability, essential for supporting heavy machinery.
4. Cost: AISI 316 is typically more expensive due to its alloying elements. However, in environments where corrosion resistance is critical, the investment is justified by the extended lifespan and reduced maintenance costs.

Design Features for Hygienic Leveling Feet

To comply with EHEDG guidelines, leveling feet should incorporate the following design elements:

• Sealed Protected Spindle: The spindle should be smooth at the end towards the base, with threads protected by a sleeve to ensure easy cleaning and prevent contamination. The sleeve also functions as a nut, and the spindle and base are sealed with silicone sealing. This design prevents the accumulation of debris and facilitates cleaning.
• Vibration Reduction: Incorporating a rubber pad, such as FDA-approved NBR (Nitrile rubber), can reduce vibration and provide anti-slip properties. This not only enhances stability but also contributes to hygiene by minimizing movement that could lead to contamination.
• Material Selection: Components should be made from high-quality stainless steel, such as AISI 304 or AISI 316, to ensure corrosion resistance and longevity. The choice between AISI 304 and AISI 316 depends on the specific environmental conditions and hygiene requirements of the application.

Selecting the appropriate stainless steel grade for EHEDG hygienic machine leveling feet is crucial for ensuring both compliance and longevity. While AISI 304 may suffice in less demanding environments, AISI 316 offers superior corrosion resistance, making it the preferred choice in industries with stringent hygiene standards and exposure to aggressive agents. By carefully considering the specific requirements of the application, manufacturers can make informed decisions that ensure both performance and compliance.

Why Choose Stainless Steel for Hygienic Machine Leveling Feet?

Machine leveling feet in hygienic environments must withstand frequent cleaning, exposure to chemicals, and harsh operating conditions. Stainless steel is the preferred material due to its:

• Corrosion resistance – Prevents rust and material degradation.
• Non-porous surface – Reduces bacterial growth.
• High durability – Withstands mechanical stress and load-bearing requirements.
• Ease of cleaning – Ensures compliance with EHEDG, FDA, and 3-A sanitary standards.

However, within the category of stainless steel, AISI 304 and AISI 316 offer different levels of performance depending on the environment they are used in.

---

Comparison: AISI 304 vs. AISI 316 for Hygienic Machine Leveling Feet

1. Chemical Composition

The primary difference between AISI 304 and AISI 316 lies in their chemical makeup:

Stainless Steel Grade	Chromium (%)	Nickel (%)	Molybdenum (%)
AISI 304	18-20	8-10.5	0
AISI 316	16-18	10-14	2-3

AISI 316 contains molybdenum, which significantly improves its resistance to chlorides, acids, and harsh chemicals.

---

2. Corrosion Resistance

• AISI 304: Suitable for most hygienic applications, offering strong resistance to oxidation and general corrosion. However, it is not ideal for environments with high exposure to saltwater, chlorine, or acidic chemicals.
• AISI 316: Offers superior corrosion resistance due to its molybdenum content, making it the preferred choice for harsh environments, such as those with exposure to aggressive cleaning agents, brine, or acidic food products.

---

3. Applications in Different Industries

The choice between AISI 304 and AISI 316 depends on the industry and its specific environmental challenges:

Food Processing Industry

• Common contaminants: Salt, acids, and cleaning agents.
• Recommended material: AISI 316 is preferred for areas handling acidic foods (e.g., tomato-based products, citrus fruits) or where salt exposure is high (e.g., seafood processing).
• AISI 304 is acceptable in dry food processing or general-use areas.

Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Industries

• Common contaminants: Sterilizing chemicals, bioactive substances.
• Recommended material: AISI 316 is ideal due to its resistance to aggressive cleaning protocols, including autoclaving and exposure to hydrogen peroxide.
• AISI 304 may be used in less chemically aggressive environments.

Dairy Processing

• Common contaminants: Lactic acid, high humidity.
• Recommended material: AISI 316, as lactic acid exposure can lead to corrosion over time.
• AISI 304 may be suitable for dry storage areas or equipment not directly exposed to liquid dairy products.

Chemical & Cosmetics Industry

• Common contaminants: Detergents, solvents, and active chemical compounds.
• Recommended material: AISI 316 due to superior chemical resistance.
• AISI 304 may be used in non-reactive environments.

Marine & Beverage Industry

• Common contaminants: Saltwater (marine), carbonation, and acidic beverages (beverage industry).
• Recommended material: AISI 316 because of its high resistance to chlorides and acids.
• AISI 304 is unsuitable for saline-rich environments.

---

Hygienic Design Features of EHEDG-Compliant Leveling Feet

Regardless of the stainless steel grade chosen, EHEDG-compliant machine leveling feet must meet the following hygienic design principles:

1. Sealed Components – No exposed threads; sealed spindle design prevents contamination.
2. Smooth Surfaces – Polished to reduce bacterial growth.
3. Sloped Design – Allows water and cleaning agents to drain easily.
4. No Crevices – Prevents bacteria accumulation.
5. FDA-Approved Seals – Uses silicone or rubber seals that comply with food and pharmaceutical standards.

---

Cost Considerations: AISI 304 vs. AISI 316

• AISI 304 is more cost-effective, making it a practical choice where corrosion resistance is not a major concern.
• AISI 316 is more expensive due to its molybdenum content but offers longer service life in harsh conditions, reducing maintenance and replacement costs over time.

When to Choose AISI 304

✅ General food production
✅ Pharmaceutical equipment in low-corrosion environments
✅ Dry or less aggressive processing areas

When to Choose AISI 316

✅ High-exposure to cleaning chemicals
✅ Seafood, dairy, and acidic food processing
✅ Pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and chemical applications
✅ Marine and beverage processing

---

AISI 304 vs. AISI 316 for EHEDG Hygienic Machine Leveling Feet

Both AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steel offer excellent properties for manufacturing EHEDG hygienic machine leveling feet. However, AISI 316 is the superior choice for environments requiring high resistance to chemicals, acids, and chlorides. While AISI 304 provides a cost-effective solution, it is best suited for less demanding hygienic applications.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on the specific industry requirements, exposure to corrosive agents, and budget constraints. Choosing the right stainless steel grade ensures long-lasting, hygienic, and regulatory-compliant machine leveling feet, helping businesses maintain high sanitation standards while improving the longevity of their equipment.

Questions and contact

Contact us for hygienic solution

Get our catalogue here